Comparing Small Form Factor Coaxial RF Connectors

Which type of cable should I use?

At Suntsu, one of our primary focuses is wireless communication. We assist our customers with cables specifically designed for antenna-to-board connectivity. As our customers aim for more compact and smaller designs, we recognize the importance of efficient interconnection types. The U.FL connector is a well-established, high-frequency miniature coaxial interconnection option, although it is proprietary to Hirose. Consequently, many manufacturers produce connectors that are 100% U.FL compatible

but are marketed under various names, such as IPEX, IPX, MHF, AMC, UMCC, and MCRF.

Many of our customers have asked: Which small coaxial RF connector should I use for my antenna cable? Is there a difference in U.FL, IPEX, or MMCX (Micro miniature coaxial)?

Let’s look at a brief comparison of the connector types.  At first glance, it appears U.FL/IPEX/IPX may have better performance than MMCX because U.FL/IPEX/IPX are designed for lower VSWR at < 3GHz frequencies. However, this is just a connector level comparison.  We need to go deeper than just connectors and consider are performance, robustness, and ease of use across the connector, cable and end-point (antenna or otherwise).

At Suntsu, one of our primary focuses is wireless communication. We assist our customers with cables specifically designed for antenna-to-board connectivity. As our customers aim for more compact and smaller designs, we recognize the importance of efficient interconnection types. The U.FL connector is a well-established, high-frequency miniature coaxial interconnection option, although it is proprietary to Hirose. Consequently, many manufacturers produce connectors that are 100% U.FL compatible but are marketed under various names, such as IPEX, IPX, MHF, AMC, UMCC, and MCRF.

Many of our customers have asked: Which small coaxial RF connector should I use for my antenna cable? Is there a difference in U.FL, IPEX, or MMCX (Micro miniature coaxial)?

Let’s look at a brief comparison of the connector types.  At first glance, it appears U.FL/IPEX/IPX may have better performance than MMCX because U.FL/IPEX/IPX are designed for lower VSWR at < 3GHz frequencies. However, this is just a connector level comparison.  We need to go deeper than just connectors and consider are performance, robustness, and ease of use across the connector, cable and end-point (antenna or otherwise).

TypeU.FLIPEX/IPXMMCX
StandardHirose ProprietaryDesigned to be U.FL CompatibleCECC 22220
ManufacturersHiroseManyMany
VSWR=<1.30 (Up to 3GHz) 1.30 – 1.50 (3 – 6GHz)=<1.30 (Up to 3GHz) 1.30 – 1.50 (3 – 6GHz)=<1.50 (Up to 6GHz)
Size/Footprint2.5mm Max mating height 3.0mm diameter plug2.5mm Max mating height 3.0mm diameter plugHeight varies with jack/plug combination. 2.4mm diameter plug
OrientationRight Angle OnlyRight Angle OnlyStraight or Right Angle
Contact RetentionGood: 0.15N to 4N/ 0.03lbs to 0.9lbsGood: 2N to 4N/ 0.45lbs to 0.9lbsStrong: ? 10N/2.3lbs
Engagement ForceN/A=<5N/1.12lbs6N to 15N/1.4lbs to 3.4lbs
Disengagement ForceN/AInitial: =< 5N /1.12lbs 30 cycles: ? 3N/0.67lbs6N to 15N/1.4lbs to 3.4lbs
Mating Cycles30 Cycles30 Cycles500 Cycles
Removal Tool NeededYesYesNo

Performance

The table considers just the connector alone.  It is more important to compare performance in an entire antenna/cable assembly.  Different combinations of connectors, cable types, and cable lengths will affect system performance, and designers should focus on the VSWR specs of the entire assembly.

Examples of VSWR value (lower is better):

IPEX connector: =<1.30

MMCX connector: =<1.50

SMA connector: =<1.50

IPEX to MMCX with 50mm cable: =< 2.00 (whole assembly)

MMCX to SMA with 200mm cable: =< 2.00 (whole assembly)

When looking at the end-to-end signal path of antenna and cable assembly, there likely will be little difference in performance between connector types, unless the application requires very stringent tolerances. Around 20% of Nexsun’s customers fall into the stringent category, for which we have done specialized designs.  However, for the other 80%, we consider a different set of decision criteria:

Robustness

MMCX is the better choice. MMCX has much higher contact retention than U.FL/IPEX/IPX and requires greater force to disengage, so will better withstand jostling and vibration. Designed for 500 mating cycles, MMCX will last longer than U.FL/IPEX/IPX, if the connection needs to be regularly disconnected and re-connected.

Ease of Use

Generally, U.FL/IPEX/IPX is the better choice when space is at a premium in the design, but MMCX will be easier to use from an end user maintenance point of view.  Here are detailed considerations:

  • Mating profile: U.FL/IPEX/IPX will have a smaller profile than MMCX – the difference being a 2.5mm maximum height when mated versus 6.0mm minimum height with MMCX.
  • Deployability:   MMCX offers more configuration options for plug and receptacle, with straight and right angle options, while U.FL/IPEX/IPX are available only in a straight vertical receptacle and right angle plug.
  • Serviceability:   When deployed in the field, U.FL/IPEX/IPX connections require a special tool for extraction, to avoid damage to the connectors. Servicing MMCX connections does not require any special tools.
  • Footprint:   U.FL/IPEX/IPX and MMCX all have similar footprints of 3 – 4 square mm.   Beyond the connector, designers should consider the spacing for the right angle inserted cables and cable management.

Suntsu has cultivated a select group of suppliers for RF Connector products:

  • For common coaxial RF connectors such as BNC, TNC, F-Type, SMA, and SMB, Suntsu offers products from Amtek Technology.
  • For standard miniature RF connectors and antennas (SMA, RP-SMA, MMCX, IPX), Suntsu offers products from Master Wave Technology.

For customers who need customized miniature RF connectors and cable assemblies designed for wireless applications, Suntsu offers Suntsu products.

Key Considerations for Selecting the Right Coaxial RF Connector

Beyond the specific performance metrics and physical attributes, several broader considerations should guide your decision-making process when selecting coaxial RF connectors for your wireless communication applications. Understanding these factors can significantly impact your product’s overall performance, manufacturability, and cost-effectiveness.

Extensive Network

Frequency Range and Bandwidth

While we’ve touched upon VSWR, the specific frequency range and required bandwidth of your application are paramount. Different connector types are optimized for different frequency bands. For instance, while U.FL/IPEX/IPX are suitable for lower frequencies (typically < 3GHz), applications in higher frequency ranges, such as 5G or Wi-Fi 6E, might necessitate connectors with superior performance at millimeter-wave frequencies. Suntsu’s engineering services can help analyze your specific frequency requirements and recommend the most appropriate connector solution, even assisting with custom designs if off-the-shelf options don’t meet your needs.

Extensive Network

Impedance Matching

Most RF systems are designed to operate at a characteristic impedance of 50 Ohms. Mismatches in impedance between the connector, cable, and antenna can lead to signal reflections and power loss, degrading overall system performance. Ensuring proper impedance matching across the entire signal path is crucial for optimal performance, and our team is adept at providing circuit board analysis to ensure seamless integration.

Extensive Network

Environmental Factors

The operating environment of your device plays a critical role in connector selection. Factors such as temperature extremes, humidity, vibration, and shock can all impact connector reliability. For ruggedized applications, connectors with higher IP ratings (Ingress Protection) for dust and water resistance, or those designed for extreme temperatures, may be necessary. Suntsu understands the diverse needs of OEMs and contract manufacturers, offering a range of robust components to withstand challenging conditions.

Extensive Network

Cost and Availability

While technical specifications are important, practical considerations like cost and availability are equally vital, especially for high-volume production. Proprietary connectors might offer specific advantages but could come at a higher cost or have longer lead times. Standardized connectors often provide a balance of performance and cost-effectiveness. Suntsu’s unparalleled sourcing capabilities and global network allow us to mitigate supply chain challenges and provide access to a wide variety of components, including hard-to-find and obsolete parts, at competitive prices. Our independent distribution model ensures you have access to a broad selection.

The Suntsu Advantage: Your Partner in RF Connector Solutions

Choosing the right coaxial RF connector is a nuanced decision that impacts everything from signal integrity to product reliability and cost. At Suntsu, we don’t just supply connectors; we partner with you to navigate these complexities and ensure your designs come to life efficiently and effectively.

Our commitment to your success is reflected in our comprehensive approach:

  • Unmatched Sourcing Capabilities: Whether you need common coaxial RF connectors like BNC, TNC, F-Type, SMA, and SMB from Amtek Technology, or standard miniature RF connectors and antennas (SMA, RP-SMA, MMCX, IPX) from Master Wave Technology, Suntsu has cultivated a select group of suppliers to meet your diverse needs. We excel at shortage mitigation and obsolescence management, ensuring your production lines remain uninterrupted.
  • Engineering Expertise: For customers who need customized miniature RF connectors and cable assemblies designed for wireless applications, we offer Suntsu branded products developed with our in-house engineering expertise. Our dedicated team can provide valuable assistance with design alternatives and even custom component creation, empowering you to overcome technical challenges and optimize your projects. We offer comprehensive engineering services, including engineering design services and component engineering services, to guide you through every stage.
  • Streamlined Inventory Management: We understand the pressures purchasing managers face in securing components and managing inventory efficiently. Suntsu simplifies your life by offering streamlined inventory management programs, including vendor managed inventory and excess inventory solutions. These programs provide complete visibility and control over component stock, helping to reduce costs and waste while improving cash flow.
  • Reliable Long-Term Partnership: Suntsu is more than just a supplier; we are a reliable long-term partner committed to supporting your innovation. We aim to reduce risks and delays, improve design flexibility, and provide convenient purchasing options, making us your one-stop shop for all your electronic component needs.

If you want suggestions for your RF system design, contact us today! We are confident our expertise can help you make the best choices for your wireless communication projects.

Ready to optimize your RF system design and secure the right connectors for your project? Contact Suntsu today for expert guidance and reliable sourcing solutions that will bring your designs to life.

FAQs

What does VSWR mean in relation to RF Connectors?

VSWR stands for Voltage Standing Wave Ratio. It’s a measure of how efficiently radio frequency power is transmitted from a power source, through a transmission line (like a cable and connector), into a load (like an antenna). A low VSWR (closer to 1:1) indicates a good impedance match and efficient power transfer, while a high VSWR suggests significant signal reflections and power loss, which can degrade system performance.

Can U.FL and MMCX connectors be used interchangeably?

While both U.FL (and its compatible variants like IPEX) and MMCX are miniature coaxial RF connectors, they are generally not interchangeable due to differences in their physical mating mechanisms, size, and sometimes electrical characteristics. U.FL connectors have a snap-on mechanism, while MCX often features a “lock-snap” for better retention. Adapters exist, but direct interchangeability is not typical.

What are the main advantages of using smaller coaxial connectors like U.FL or MMCX?

The primary advantage of smaller coaxial RF connectors is their compact size, which allows for integration into miniaturized electronic devices where space is a premium, such as smartphones, tablets, IoT devices, and drones. They enable high-density PCB layouts and smaller product footprints.

Why is proper cable management important for Coaxial RF Connectors?

Proper cable management is crucial because coaxial cables, especially those connected to small RF connectors, can be susceptible to performance degradation from excessive bending, kinking, or strain. Maintaining appropriate bend radii and securing cables prevents damage to the connector-to-cable interface and ensures consistent signal performance over time.

What should I do if I have an obsolete RF connector or hard-to-find component?

If you’re dealing with obsolete or hard-to-find RF connectors or other electronic components, it’s best to consult with a specialized distributor like Suntsu. We have extensive global sourcing capabilities and engineering expertise to help you find suitable alternatives, manage obsolescence, or even develop custom solutions to keep your projects on track.

keyboard_arrow_up